- Score
- 8.6 (-0.17 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 73.9% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 46.0% faster
Meta
Release: 2026-11-09
Tested on: 2026-11-09 21:37
meta/muse-ember::xhigh
~150B total (~10B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Muse Ember scores above Muse Wonder for under 5% of the cost →
Summary
Muse Ember scores 8.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #73. It has 10.0 reliability, a 76.8% pass rate, $0.232 total cost, and 13.90s average response time.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 9.4 (+0.62 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 21.4% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 55.1% faster
- Score
- 9.3 (+0.56 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.221 · 4.8% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.05s · 56.4% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-11-09
- Parameters
- ~150B total (~10B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Meta lists Muse Ember (muse-ember-1.0) as the smallest, efficient execution model among API-hosted Muse models, with no public weights and no disclosed size or architecture. The 150B total / 10B active MoE values are a low-confidence small-tier catalog estimate, scaled down from the Muse Spark family estimate and consistent with its $0.10/$0.50 price.
8.8
Consistency
8.9
10.0
$0.232
Total Output Tokens
409,112
Total Input Tokens
274,208
Input Price
$0.100 / 1M
Output Price
$0.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.004 / 1M
Cache Write Price
$0.125 / 1M
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#73 Muse Ember
xhigh- Cost
- $0.008
- Time
- 24.3s
- Tokens
- 14,705 tok
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Muse EmberxhighvsGPT-5.4mediumMuse EmberxhighvsMuse Spark OpenmediumMuse EmberxhighvsQwen3.8 MAXlowMuse EmberxhighvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighMuse EmberxhighvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse EmberxhighvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumMuse EmberxhighvsPareto 26.9defaultMuse EmberxhighvsKimi K3.1 PromaxMuse EmberxhighvsClaude Fable 5mediumMuse EmberxhighvsMuse Spark 1.2low
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.9 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |