Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 7.0. Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.064 vs $0.467. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) is faster at 24.04s vs 45.90s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#92
Total Output Tokens
135,464
Response Time (avg)
24.04s
Total Cost
$0.467
Rank
#91
Total Output Tokens
462,623
Response Time (avg)
45.90s
Total Cost
$0.064
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (7.0), while costing about 7.3x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.9 7.0
Rank #92 #91
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 7 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.237 0.636
Total Cost $0.467 $0.064
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,907 114,468
Output Tokens 7,213 12,786
Reasoning Tokens 128,251 449,837
Response Time (avg) 24.04s 45.90s
Response Time (max) 257.00s 593.64s
Response Time (total) 528.92s 1009.84s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#92 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
25.6s
Tokens
2,939 tok

#91 Qwen3.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 33.10s 7,893 416 33,658
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 46.78s 7,893 563 61,902

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair