Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.5 vs 7.6. GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.258 vs $0.275. GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) is faster at 6.70s vs 12.95s, with pass rates of 65.1% vs 63.5%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 Luna (medium)It has the best score here (7.6), while responding about 1.9x faster than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna medium Release: 2026-07-09
Score 7.5 7.6
Rank #60 #57
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.1% 63.5%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 2.498 1.978
Total Cost $0.275 $0.258
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,750 35,699
Output Tokens 2,098 2,148
Reasoning Tokens 80,027 34,740
Response Time (avg) 12.95s 6.70s
Response Time (max) 81.45s 29.85s
Response Time (total) 271.92s 140.62s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
25.6s
Tokens
2,939 tok

#57 GPT-5.6 Luna

medium
Cost
$0.014
Time
14.6s
Tokens
2,362 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 33.10s 7,893 416 33,658
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 10.38s 7,302 564 9,928

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair