Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) vs Qwen3.6 Plus (medium)

Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.2. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.405 vs $0.482. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) is faster at 20.83s vs 43.12s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 71.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#77
Total Output Tokens
136,164
Response Time (avg)
20.83s
Total Cost
$0.482
Rank
#44
Total Output Tokens
191,237
Response Time (avg)
43.12s
Total Cost
$0.405
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Plus (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.2 7.8
Rank #77 #44
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.8 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 71.2%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.378 1.514
Total Cost $0.482 $0.405
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,076 97,689
Output Tokens 9,071 6,412
Reasoning Tokens 127,093 184,825
Response Time (avg) 20.83s 43.12s
Response Time (max) 199.97s 291.55s
Response Time (total) 458.31s 905.53s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#77 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

high
Cost
$0.009
Time
26.4s
Tokens
3,117 tok

#44 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.4 7.9 44.4% 1 22.00s 7,893 422 20,461
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair