Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Summary

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.0. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.030 vs $0.141. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) is faster at 4.35s vs 6.47s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 57.1%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.0 vs 6.2), while costing about 4.7x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09
Score 6.0 6.2
Rank #124 #113
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.6 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 57.1%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.427 1.404
Total Cost $0.030 $0.141
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,464 34,218
Output Tokens 4,227 2,110
Reasoning Tokens 34,864 15,571
Response Time (avg) 6.47s 4.35s
Response Time (max) 25.49s 18.06s
Response Time (total) 135.80s 91.45s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

#113 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair