- Rank
- #258
- Total Output Tokens
- 165,031
- Response Time (avg)
- 65.52s
- Total Cost
- $0.102
Ring 2.6 1t (medium) vs GPT-5 Nano (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. Ring 2.6 1t (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.102 vs $0.159. GPT-5 Nano (medium) is faster at 56.55s vs 65.52s, with pass rates of 56.5% vs 53.6%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #260
- Total Output Tokens
- 307,921
- Response Time (avg)
- 56.55s
- Total Cost
- $0.159
Recommended model
Ring 2.6 1t (medium)
It has the best score here (5.7), while costing about 1.6x less than GPT-5 Nano (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ring 2.6 1t Ring 2.6 1t medium | GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Rank | #258 | #260 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.9 | 6.5 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 56.5% | 53.6% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 10 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.654 | 1.737 |
| Total Cost | $0.102 | $0.159 |
| Input Price | $0.075 / 1M | $0.050 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.625 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | $0.005 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 113,613 | 314,436 |
| Output Tokens | 122,706 | 13,578 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 42,325 | 294,343 |
| Response Time (avg) | 65.52s | 56.55s |
| Response Time (max) | 304.19s | 227.89s |
| Response Time (total) | 1376.01s | 961.32s |
| Parameters | 1T total (63B active) | ~120B total (~5B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#258 Ring 2.6 1t
medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#260 GPT-5 Nano
medium- Cost
- $0.006
- Time
- 108.5s
- Tokens
- 13,209 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 21ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 4.7 | 3.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 94.09s | 219,492 | 1,541 | 23,943 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 42.21s | 810 | 3,833 | 4,891 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 6.5 | 7.9 | 58.3% | 1 | 25.50s | 606 | 1,221 | 21,184 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 59.65s | 834 | 1,369 | 3,985 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 7.0 | 7.7 | 55.6% | 1 | 41.62s | 7,305 | 740 | 41,152 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 257.28s | 92,535 | 101,651 | 6,088 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 146.93s | 71,846 | 7,156 | 86,976 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 37.36s | 8,046 | 840 | 1,937 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.7 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 2 | 21.42s | 7,140 | 453 | 10,560 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 65.30s | 882 | 9,371 | 14,584 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.4 | 1.6 | 44.4% | 3 | 124.13s | 628 | 232 | 73,792 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 4.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 58.26s | 561 | 150 | 583 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 4.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 17.51s | 477 | 202 | 4,608 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.78s | 774 | 266 | 1,831 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.64s | 660 | 312 | 4,736 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 5.9 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 20.73s | 792 | 697 | 2,479 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 20.63s | 642 | 929 | 14,272 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 104.44s | 8,136 | 234 | 1,531 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 33.30s | 5,445 | 558 | 6,976 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 113.91s | 243 | 4,295 | 4,416 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 20.13s | 195 | 234 | 6,144 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing 2.6 1tmediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5 NanomediumSeed 2.1 TurbononevsGPT-5 NanomediumRing 2.6 1tmediumvsGPT-5.4 MininoneSeed 2.1 TurbononevsRing 2.6 1tmediumLing 3.0 FlashhighvsGPT-5 NanomediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashnonevsRing 2.6 1tmediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashnonevsGPT-5 NanomediumGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsGPT-5 NanomediumRing 2.6 1tmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsRing 2.6 1tmediumGPT-5 NanomediumvsSpace Bunny Alphalow