- Rank
- #81
- Total Output Tokens
- 648,854
- Response Time (avg)
- 88.74s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (high)
GLM 5.2 (high) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $1.644. GLM 5.2 (high) is faster at 69.11s vs 88.74s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 71.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #75
- Total Output Tokens
- 382,582
- Response Time (avg)
- 69.11s
- Total Cost
- $1.644
Recommended model
GLM 5.2 (high)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Rank | #81 | #75 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.0% | 71.0% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 7.314 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $1.644 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.410 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $3.990 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | $0.260 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 369,495 | 288,913 |
| Output Tokens | 172,852 | 79,462 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 476,002 | 303,120 |
| Response Time (avg) | 88.74s | 69.11s |
| Response Time (max) | 567.88s | 599.43s |
| Response Time (total) | 2041.10s | 1589.43s |
| Parameters | 560B total (25B active) | 744B total (40B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#81 Ling 3.1 Flash
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 101.1s
- Tokens
- 11,607 tok
#75 GLM 5.2
high
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 100.10s | 233,792 | 12,506 | 12,249 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 52.45s | 205,091 | 7,422 | 10,505 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.24s | 750 | 1,152 | 3,396 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.80s | 639 | 406 | 2,660 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.15s | 8,298 | 19,577 | 62,002 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 6.4 | 8.6 | 33.3% | 0 | 73.03s | 5,124 | 2,302 | 22,546 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 306.46s | 106,402 | 26,806 | 100,471 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 321.47s | 61,516 | 18,824 | 63,861 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.92s | 8,016 | 1,334 | 3,754 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.81s | 7,143 | 435 | 1,414 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 262.25s | 837 | 100,307 | 228,869 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.1 | 6.5 | 11.1% | 1 | 126.85s | 560 | 49,045 | 157,522 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.28s | 546 | 152 | 1,820 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.90s | 498 | 63 | 1,743 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.57s | 744 | 323 | 1,317 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.26s | 678 | 151 | 1,210 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 42.32s | 747 | 5,455 | 40,080 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 66.7% | 2 | 33.71s | 665 | 568 | 22,392 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 47.17s | 9,135 | 3,850 | 12,018 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.25s | 6,861 | 246 | 503 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32.55s | 228 | 1,390 | 10,026 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 127.82s | 138 | 0 | 18,764 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2highGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGLM 5.2highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsGLM 5.2highGPT-5 MinimediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsGLM 5.2highGPT-6 LunamediumvsGLM 5.2highClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGLM 5.2high