Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.8 (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (high)

GLM 5.2 (high) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.3. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.620 vs $3.490. Claude Opus 4.8 (medium) is faster at 16.72s vs 69.11s, with pass rates of 82.6% vs 71.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#80
Total Output Tokens
67,842
Response Time (avg)
16.72s
Total Cost
$3.490
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
382,582
Response Time (avg)
69.11s
Total Cost
$1.620
Recommended model Claude Opus 4.8 (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.3 vs 8.4), while responding about 4.1x faster than GLM 5.2 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 medium Release: 2026-05-28 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.3 8.4
Rank #80 #75
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.6% 71.0%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 20.527 7.314
Total Cost $3.490 $1.620
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $3.990 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 360,294 288,913
Output Tokens 43,441 79,462
Reasoning Tokens 24,401 303,120
Response Time (avg) 16.72s 69.11s
Response Time (max) 99.37s 599.43s
Response Time (total) 384.66s 1589.43s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#80 Claude Opus 4.8

medium
Cost
$0.057
Time
23.1s
Tokens
2,412 tok

#75 GLM 5.2

high
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.33s 10,590 9,945 1,381
GLM 5.2 6.4 8.6 33.3% 0 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Claude Opus 4.8mediumvsGrok 4.5highClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsKimi K3maxClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashhighKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2highGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGLM 5.2highClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsGLM 5.2highGPT-5 MinimediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsGLM 5.2highGPT-6 LunamediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGLM 5.2highClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731high