Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.1 Flash (high) vs GLM 5.3 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.8. Ling 3.1 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.610. GLM 5.3 (high) is faster at 28.38s vs 87.39s, with pass rates of 69.6% vs 75.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#105
Total Output Tokens
687,692
Response Time (avg)
87.39s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#107
Total Output Tokens
68,482
Response Time (avg)
28.38s
Total Cost
$0.610
Recommended model GLM 5.3 (high)

It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 3.1x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash high Release: 2026-10-03 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 high Release: 2026-08-20
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #105 #107
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.6% 75.4%
Flaky tests 2 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 4.351
Total Cost $0.000 $0.610
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.140 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 324,691 219,811
Output Tokens 181,251 8,811
Reasoning Tokens 506,441 59,671
Response Time (avg) 87.39s 28.38s
Response Time (max) 665.85s 159.91s
Response Time (total) 2010.08s 652.78s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#105 Ling 3.1 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
181.1s
Tokens
21,073 tok

#107 GLM 5.3

high
Cost
$0.085
Time
362.5s
Tokens
19,310 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 83.41s 8,298 17,470 54,626
GLM 5.3 6.6 5.0 66.7% 2 18.89s 7,317 473 8,190

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair