- Rank
- #125
- Total Output Tokens
- 618,331
- Response Time (avg)
- 87.39s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (high) vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (medium)
Ling 3.1 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 4.7. Ling 3.1 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.195. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (medium) is faster at 81.93s vs 87.39s, with pass rates of 69.6% vs 47.8%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #368
- Total Output Tokens
- 732,696
- Response Time (avg)
- 81.93s
- Total Cost
- $0.195
Recommended model
Ling 3.1 Flash (high)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash high | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium Free Available |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.9 | 4.7 |
| Rank | #125 | #368 |
| Reliability | 9.8 | 9.8 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 5.8 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 69.6% | 47.8% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 12 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.195 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.060 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.160 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | $0.030 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 324,691 | 195,780 |
| Output Tokens | 181,251 | 167,746 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 506,441 | 598,384 |
| Response Time (avg) | 87.39s | 81.93s |
| Response Time (max) | 665.85s | 437.11s |
| Response Time (total) | 2010.08s | 1884.31s |
| Parameters | 560B total (25B active) | 30B total (3B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Weights available |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#125 Ling 3.1 Flash
high- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 181.1s
- Tokens
- 21,073 tok
#368 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 130.5s
- Tokens
- 6,750 tok
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.42s | 204,838 | 9,381 | 8,546 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 341.79s | 69,450 | 2,044 | 3,645 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.44s | 750 | 1,219 | 3,505 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 6.9 | 7.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.34s | 696 | 6,904 | 20,862 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 83.41s | 8,298 | 17,470 | 54,626 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 4.4 | 5.1 | 33.3% | 2 | 285.47s | 7,623 | 78,065 | 297,359 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 351.19s | 90,556 | 44,145 | 153,951 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 136.91s | 98,571 | 15,769 | 112,376 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 17.38s | 8,016 | 1,517 | 3,710 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 3.7 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 2 | 23.24s | 7,944 | 4,195 | 30,097 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 222.88s | 837 | 94,527 | 212,965 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 74.73s | 798 | 54,657 | 91,174 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.9 | 9.4 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.82s | 546 | 38 | 2,140 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 5.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.36s | 516 | 3,127 | 3,157 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.31s | 744 | 349 | 1,746 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 8.5 | 6.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 3.75s | 723 | 531 | 4,404 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 37.46s | 747 | 5,017 | 29,548 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 4.2 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 10.49s | 726 | 1,170 | 18,195 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 38.25s | 9,131 | 2,943 | 9,161 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.92s | 8,526 | 154 | 2,518 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 81.83s | 228 | 4,645 | 26,543 | |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 44.02s | 207 | 1,130 | 14,597 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 3.1 FlashhighvsMuse WondermaxMercury 2.5 PreviewdefaultvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableLing 3.1 FlashhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumNorth Mini CodedefaultFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableLing 3.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.5mediumGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsLing 3.1 FlashhighNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableLing 3.1 FlashhighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.6mediumLing 3.1 FlashhighvsQwen3.7 MaxnoneLing 3.1 FlashhighvsQwen3.7 Plusnone