Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Inception: Mercury 2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

GLM 5.1 (medium) leads on average score with 7.1 vs 7.0. Mercury 2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.093 vs $0.535. Mercury 2 (medium) is faster at 2.72s vs 46.77s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelMercury 2 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.1), while costing about 5.8x less than GLM 5.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Mercury 2 Mercury 2 medium Release: 2026-02-24 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.0 7.1
Rank #77 #73
Reliability 10.0 8.3
Consistency 8.8 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 69.7%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.928 4.202
Total Cost $0.093 $0.535
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.750 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 109,572 82,623
Output Tokens 10,313 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 76,806 136,463
Response Time (avg) 2.72s 46.77s
Response Time (max) 14.63s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 57.12s 982.16s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#77 Mercury 2

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
2.1s
Tokens
1,702 tok

#73 GLM 5.1

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 8.2 7.7 77.8% 1 2.04s 7,065 296 11,328
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair