- Rank
- #131
- Total Output Tokens
- 87,554
- Response Time (avg)
- 2.95s
- Total Cost
- $0.094
Mercury 2 (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 7.0 vs 7.0. Mercury 2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.094 vs $0.727. Mercury 2 (medium) is faster at 2.95s vs 58.80s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 65.2%.
- Rank
- #129
- Total Output Tokens
- 215,889
- Response Time (avg)
- 58.80s
- Total Cost
- $0.727
Recommended model
Mercury 2 (medium)
It has the best score here (7.0), while costing about 7.8x less than GLM 5.1 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Mercury 2 Mercury 2 medium | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Rank | #131 | #129 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Consistency | 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 53.0% | 65.2% |
| Flaky tests | 4 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.933 | 6.923 |
| Total Cost | $0.094 | $0.727 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.966 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.750 / 1M | $3.036 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 110,515 | 82,592 |
| Output Tokens | 10,325 | 16,089 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 77,229 | 199,800 |
| Response Time (avg) | 2.95s | 58.80s |
| Response Time (max) | 14.63s | 308.75s |
| Response Time (total) | 61.89s | 1234.72s |
| Parameters | ~100B | 744B total (40B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#131 Mercury 2
medium- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 2.1s
- Tokens
- 1,702 tok
#129 GLM 5.1
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Mercury 2mediumvsGPT-5.5noneGPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumMercury 2mediumvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneClaude Fable 5.1lowvsMercury 2mediumClaude Fable 5.1lowvsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsMercury 2mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumSolar Pro 4highvsGLM 5.1mediumMercury 2mediumvsSolar Pro 4highStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGLM 5.1mediumMercury 2mediumvsStep 3.7 Flashlow