Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Inception: Mercury 2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Summary

Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.6 Flash benchmark comparison: Mercury 2 leads on average score with 6.6 vs 5.4. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.058. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 1.60s vs 2.24s, with pass rates of 54.0% vs 33.3%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.6 Flash - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (5.4), lower cost than Mercury 2, and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Mercury 2 Mercury 2 medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.6 5.4
Rank #82 #129
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 54.0% 33.3%
Flaky tests 3 0
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.578 0.266
Total Cost $0.058 $0.015
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $0.750 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 35,116 50,810
Output Tokens 4,048 4,164
Reasoning Tokens 61,219 0
Response Time (avg) 2.24s 1.60s
Response Time (max) 14.63s 4.60s
Response Time (total) 44.72s 33.59s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#82 Mercury 2

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
2.1s
Tokens
1,702 tok

#129 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 6.9 9.9 50.0% 0 1.12s 554 2,546 2,609
Qwen3.6 Flash 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 1.63s 696 1,554 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 8.2 7.7 77.8% 1 2.04s 7,065 296 11,328
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.28s 12,909 268 4,887
Qwen3.6 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.22s 24,675 315 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 7.3 5.9 83.3% 1 1.11s 6,234 183 1,656
Qwen3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.13s 7,794 243 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 6.48s 695 41 30,754
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 1.11s 789 15 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 4.8 10.0 0.0% 0 821ms 456 137 542
Qwen3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 947ms 522 132 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.07s 340 14 958
Qwen3.6 Flash 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 1.10s 711 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 949ms 601 361 2,781
Qwen3.6 Flash 3.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.21s 714 669 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.89s 6,080 180 1,956
Qwen3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.49s 8,211 272 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.58s 182 22 3,748
Qwen3.6 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 649ms 210 9 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair