Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.018 vs $0.122. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 5.41s vs 13.10s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 43.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#176
Total Output Tokens
13,317
Response Time (avg)
5.41s
Total Cost
$0.018
Rank
#177
Total Output Tokens
51,487
Response Time (avg)
13.10s
Total Cost
$0.122
Recommended model Gemma 4 31B

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 7.1x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #176 #177
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.7
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 43.9%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.366 1.636
Total Cost $0.018 $0.122
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,703 94,477
Output Tokens 13,317 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.41s 13.10s
Response Time (max) 29.95s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 108.12s 288.23s
Parameters 30.7B ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#176 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

#177 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair