Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low) vs Gemma 4 31B

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.620. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 5.41s vs 5.68s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 43.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-29

Compared models

Rank
#232
Total Output Tokens
28,630
Response Time (avg)
5.68s
Total Cost
$0.620
Rank
#243
Total Output Tokens
13,317
Response Time (avg)
5.41s
Total Cost
$0.016
Recommended model Gemma 4 31B

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 39.1x less than Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 low Release: 2026-09-29 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #232 #243
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.4 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 43.9%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.880 0.366
Total Cost $0.620 $0.016
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $0.340 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 166,418 125,703
Output Tokens 21,456 13,317
Reasoning Tokens 7,174 0
Response Time (avg) 5.68s 5.41s
Response Time (max) 22.74s 29.95s
Response Time (total) 124.87s 108.12s
Parameters ~1T total (~100B active) 30.7B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#232 Claude Sonnet 5.5

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
15.3s
Tokens
2,077 tok

#243 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5 3.2 9.7 0.0% 0 5.81s 10,608 5,903 0
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair