Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Gemma 4 31B (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. Gemma 4 31B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.116 vs $0.837. Gemma 4 31B (medium) is faster at 75.38s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 31B (medium)It has the best score here (6.3), while costing about 7.2x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.3 6.2
Rank #121 #130
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 66.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.044 9.130
Total Cost $0.116 $0.837
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,992 130,388
Output Tokens 34,468 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 223,278 786,040
Response Time (avg) 75.38s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 437.40s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 1507.52s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

#130 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair