Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T

The average score is effectively tied at 6.3 vs 6.3. Ring-2.6-1T (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.103 vs $0.116. Ring-2.6-1T (medium) is faster at 68.74s vs 75.38s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelRing-2.6-1T (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Release: 2026-05-10
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #121 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 60.6%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.044 0.629
Total Cost $0.116 $0.103
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,992 113,604
Output Tokens 34,468 123,079
Reasoning Tokens 223,278 42,754
Response Time (avg) 75.38s 68.74s
Response Time (max) 437.40s 304.19s
Response Time (total) 1507.52s 1374.86s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

#119 Ring-2.6-1T

medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 59.65s 834 1,369 3,985

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair