Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 9.9 vs 5.5. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower benchmark cost at $0.068 vs $0.831. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 4.12s vs 10.11s, with pass rates of 98.5% vs 37.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.6 Flash (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-21 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 9.9 5.5
Rank #1 #160
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.5% 37.9%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.955 1.509
Total Cost $0.831 $0.068
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $7.500 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 66,293 124,799
Output Tokens 2,000 15,362
Reasoning Tokens 95,464 0
Response Time (avg) 10.11s 4.12s
Response Time (max) 68.03s 53.13s
Response Time (total) 222.33s 90.55s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#1 Gemini 3.6 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.079
Time
47.9s
Tokens
10,532 tok

#160 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.49s 8,136 474 40,157
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair