Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 6.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.300 vs $1.143. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (6.8), lower cost than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium), and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.8 8.4
Rank #96 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 80.3%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.138 8.173
Total Cost $0.300 $1.143
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,753 79,240
Output Tokens 16,454 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 0 164,842
Response Time (avg) 2.65s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 25.26s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 58.27s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair