Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Max (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 9.1 vs 9.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.642 vs $0.728. Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is faster at 8.20s vs 21.53s, with pass rates of 87.9% vs 84.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-04

Rank
#13
Total Output Tokens
59,602
Response Time (avg)
8.20s
Total Cost
$0.642
Rank
#14
Total Output Tokens
84,826
Response Time (avg)
21.53s
Total Cost
$0.728
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (9.1), while responding about 2.6x faster than Qwen3.8 Max (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3.8 Max medium Release: 2026-08-04
Score 9.1 9.1
Rank #13 #14
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.7
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 87.9% 84.9%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.374 4.040
Total Cost $0.642 $0.728
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 69,747 109,046
Output Tokens 2,166 6,567
Reasoning Tokens 57,436 78,259
Response Time (avg) 8.20s 21.53s
Response Time (max) 76.68s 126.60s
Response Time (total) 180.47s 473.75s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#13 Gemini 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.201
Time
112.9s
Tokens
22,371 tok

#14 Qwen3.8 Max

medium
Cost
$0.028
Time
71.9s
Tokens
4,750 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.9 7.5 77.8% 1 12.63s 8,118 461 24,939
Qwen3.8 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 41.35s 7,893 430 23,804

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair