Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 9.1 vs 8.3. Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.642 vs $0.647. Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium) is faster at 8.20s vs 11.45s, with pass rates of 87.9% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-19 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16
Score 9.1 8.3
Rank #9 #24
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 87.9% 69.7%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.374 4.975
Total Cost $0.642 $0.647
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 69,747 142,298
Output Tokens 2,166 10,847
Reasoning Tokens 57,436 99,467
Response Time (avg) 8.20s 11.45s
Response Time (max) 76.68s 54.15s
Response Time (total) 180.47s 251.92s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#9 Gemini 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.201
Time
112.9s
Tokens
22,371 tok

#24 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.9 7.5 77.8% 1 12.63s 8,118 461 24,939
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair