Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) leads on average score with 8.8 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.224 vs $0.449. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) is faster at 5.76s vs 23.28s, with pass rates of 84.9% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#24
Total Output Tokens
35,195
Response Time (avg)
5.76s
Total Cost
$0.449
Rank
#65
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.224
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (8.8), while responding about 4.0x faster than GLM 5.2 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low Release: 2026-05-19 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.8 7.8
Rank #24 #65
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 9.3 8.0
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.9% 80.3%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 2.492 2.159
Total Cost $0.449 $0.224
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,826 37,199
Output Tokens 2,239 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 32,956 49,500
Response Time (avg) 5.76s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 53.55s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 126.71s 488.94s
Parameters ~500B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#24 Gemini 3.5 Flash

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
39.1s
Tokens
7,588 tok

#65 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 6.71s 8,118 458 13,420
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair