Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 6.0. Step 3.5 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.108 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 174.22s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 51.5%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while responding about 11.6x faster than Step 3.5 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-02-01
Score 9.5 6.0
Rank #2 #126
Reliability 10.0 9.2
Consistency 9.3 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 51.5%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 9.879 0.540
Total Cost $1.976 $0.108
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 65,707
Output Tokens 8,777 108,561
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 293,993
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 174.22s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 1597.85s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 2613.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#126 Step 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
277.1s
Tokens
23,695 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Step 3.5 Flash 2.4 5.2 0.0% 0 258.38s 2,211 13,207 22,429

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair