Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.8 vs 7.5. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.275 vs $1.115. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 8.84s vs 12.95s, with pass rates of 96.8% vs 65.1%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14
Score 9.8 7.5
Rank #1 #60
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 96.8% 65.1%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 5.575 2.498
Total Cost $1.115 $0.275
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.740 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $2.960 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,594 42,750
Output Tokens 1,975 2,098
Reasoning Tokens 115,638 80,027
Response Time (avg) 8.84s 12.95s
Response Time (max) 34.82s 81.45s
Response Time (total) 185.57s 271.92s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#1 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#60 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
25.6s
Tokens
2,939 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 33.10s 7,893 416 33,658

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair