Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

Summary

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.2. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.275 vs $0.539. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 3.48s vs 12.95s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 65.1%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium)It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 2.0x less than Claude Opus 4.8.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14
Score 7.2 7.5
Rank #73 #60
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 65.1%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 4.485 2.498
Total Cost $0.539 $0.275
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.740 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.960 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 67,104 42,750
Output Tokens 8,107 2,098
Reasoning Tokens 0 80,027
Response Time (avg) 3.48s 12.95s
Response Time (max) 17.73s 81.45s
Response Time (total) 73.00s 271.92s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#73 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#60 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
25.6s
Tokens
2,939 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 33.10s 7,893 416 33,658

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair