Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 6.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.300 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 15.07s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 65.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19
Score 9.5 6.8
Rank #4 #96
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 65.2%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 2.138
Total Cost $1.976 $0.300
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 100,753
Output Tokens 8,777 16,454
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 0
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 2.65s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 25.26s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 58.27s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#4 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#96 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair