- Rank
- #12
- Total Output Tokens
- 97,238
- Response Time (avg)
- 20.62s
- Total Cost
- $1.352
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max (medium)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 9.1. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.157 vs $1.352. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) is faster at 20.62s vs 44.32s, with pass rates of 90.9% vs 86.4%.
- Rank
- #17
- Total Output Tokens
- 226,102
- Response Time (avg)
- 44.32s
- Total Cost
- $1.157
Recommended model
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium)
It has the best score here (9.2), while responding about 2.1x faster than Qwen3.7 Max (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.2 | 9.1 |
| Rank | #12 | #17 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 90.9% | 86.4% |
| Flaky tests | 0 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 6.758 | 8.904 |
| Total Cost | $1.352 | $1.157 |
| Input Price | $2.000 / 1M | $1.475 / 1M |
| Output Price | $12.000 / 1M | $4.425 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 92,296 | 106,029 |
| Output Tokens | 5,232 | 5,748 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 92,006 | 220,354 |
| Response Time (avg) | 20.62s | 44.32s |
| Response Time (max) | 88.68s | 556.06s |
| Response Time (total) | 329.94s | 975.11s |
| Parameters | ~1.2T total (~20B active) | ~1T total (~40B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#12 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
medium- Cost
- $0.115
- Time
- 87.2s
- Tokens
- 9,629 tok
#17 Qwen3.7 Max
medium- Cost
- $0.017
- Time
- 68.8s
- Tokens
- 4,526 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.90s | 498 | 112 | 3,218 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.36s | 672 | 222 | 8,742 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 7.9 | 9.9 | 66.7% | 0 | 40.17s | 8,124 | 435 | 41,247 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 35.31s | 7,893 | 423 | 34,808 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 40.39s | 67,910 | 3,687 | 23,111 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 8.7 | 6.9 | 83.3% | 1 | 287.83s | 78,594 | 3,985 | 96,450 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.72s | 7,265 | 279 | 3,904 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 8.80s | 7,782 | 270 | 6,254 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 20.29s | 644 | 18 | 11,704 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 52.45s | 780 | 61 | 41,143 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.77s | 490 | 108 | 1,179 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.70s | 516 | 135 | 4,457 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.56s | 621 | 72 | 2,236 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.46s | 699 | 102 | 5,452 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.90s | 570 | 235 | 3,128 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 8.84s | 696 | 259 | 8,908 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 23.15s | 6,018 | 274 | 982 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.63s | 8,193 | 267 | 1,220 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.27s | 156 | 12 | 1,297 | |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 33.37s | 204 | 24 | 12,920 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Opus 5highvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6highGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.5lowQwen3.7 MaxmediumvsGrok 4.5highGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 SolhighSeed 2.1 TurbohighvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumClaude Opus 5highvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumGemini 3.7 FlashlowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumQwen3.7 MaxmediumvsGrok 4.6high