Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Max (medium) vs Grok 4.6 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.5 vs 8.5. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $2.046 vs $2.629. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) is faster at 48.35s vs 87.48s, with pass rates of 85.5% vs 82.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#67
Total Output Tokens
259,032
Response Time (avg)
48.35s
Total Cost
$2.046
Rank
#64
Total Output Tokens
312,614
Response Time (avg)
87.48s
Total Cost
$2.629
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max (medium)

It has the best score here (8.5), while responding about 1.8x faster than Grok 4.6 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22 Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 high Release: 2026-08-12
Score 8.5 8.5
Rank #67 #64
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 10.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 85.5% 82.6%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 12.033 13.833
Total Cost $2.046 $2.629
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 367,848 376,233
Output Tokens 8,753 6,687
Reasoning Tokens 250,279 305,927
Response Time (avg) 48.35s 87.48s
Response Time (max) 556.06s 618.49s
Response Time (total) 1112.11s 2012.15s
Parameters ~1T total (~40B active) ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

#64 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

high
Cost
$0.107
Time
265.1s
Tokens
18,001 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808
Grok 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 102.20s 9,579 379 51,829

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair