Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs OpenAI: GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 7.3. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.115 vs $1.253. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) is faster at 4.61s vs 10.13s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 86.4%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Release: 2026-03-03 GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24
Score 7.3 9.3
Rank #61 #6
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.9 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 86.4%
Flaky tests 0 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.884 6.594
Total Cost $0.115 $1.253
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 117,480 80,058
Output Tokens 10,589 5,378
Reasoning Tokens 46,394 23,040
Response Time (avg) 4.61s 10.13s
Response Time (max) 18.34s 56.19s
Response Time (total) 101.39s 222.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#61 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
5.2s
Tokens
1,944 tok

#6 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.09s 8,126 461 8,597
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair