Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.046 vs $0.122. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.75s vs 13.56s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 43.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#133
Total Output Tokens
10,723
Response Time (avg)
1.75s
Total Cost
$0.046
Rank
#137
Total Output Tokens
51,487
Response Time (avg)
13.56s
Total Cost
$0.122
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 2.7x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #133 #137
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 43.9%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.507 1.636
Total Cost $0.046 $0.122
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,050 94,468
Output Tokens 10,723 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.75s 13.56s
Response Time (max) 16.25s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 38.60s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#133 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.5s
Tokens
727 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 938ms 8,128 666 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair