#118 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 4.5s
- Tokens
- 727 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Summary
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.013 vs $0.064. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.06s vs 11.02s, with pass rates of 52.4% vs 46.0%.
Last updated at: 2026-07-14
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Rank | #118 | #110 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| Consistency | 8.6 | 7.6 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 52.4% | 46.0% |
| Flaky tests | 4 | 6 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 63 |
| Cost per result | 0.144 | 0.910 |
| Total Cost | $0.013 | $0.064 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Output Price | $1.500 / 1M | $0.600 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 36,710 | 41,748 |
| Output Tokens | 2,484 | 3,894 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 91,773 |
| Response Time (avg) | 1.06s | 11.02s |
| Response Time (max) | 2.97s | 104.98s |
| Response Time (total) | 22.35s | 231.37s |
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 938ms | 8,128 | 666 | 0 | |
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 4.3 | 7.3 | 11.1% | 1 | 39.07s | 6,948 | 1,166 | 55,883 |
Switch Comparison Pair