Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemma 4 31B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.018 vs $0.046. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.75s vs 5.41s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 43.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#171
Total Output Tokens
10,723
Response Time (avg)
1.75s
Total Cost
$0.046
Rank
#176
Total Output Tokens
13,317
Response Time (avg)
5.41s
Total Cost
$0.018
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 3.1x faster than Gemma 4 31B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none Release: 2026-05-08 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #171 #176
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 43.9%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.507 0.366
Total Cost $0.046 $0.018
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.340 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,059 125,703
Output Tokens 10,723 13,317
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.75s 5.41s
Response Time (max) 16.25s 29.95s
Response Time (total) 38.42s 108.12s
Parameters ~150B total (~10B active) 30.7B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#171 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.5s
Tokens
727 tok

#176 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 938ms 8,128 666 0
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair