Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Gemini 2.5 Flash leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.017 vs $0.122. Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster at 6.20s vs 13.56s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 2.5 FlashIt has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 7.3x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Release: 2025-06-17 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #129 #137
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 43.9%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.186 1.636
Total Cost $0.017 $0.122
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 39,877 94,468
Output Tokens 1,890 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.20s 13.56s
Response Time (max) 118.00s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 136.37s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#129 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.164
Time
215.5s
Tokens
65,659 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair