Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.017. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 5.41s vs 6.19s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 43.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-29

Rank
#184
Total Output Tokens
1,890
Response Time (avg)
6.19s
Total Cost
$0.017
Rank
#180
Total Output Tokens
13,317
Response Time (avg)
5.41s
Total Cost
$0.016
Recommended model Gemma 4 31B

It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Release: 2025-06-17 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #184 #180
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 43.9%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.209 0.366
Total Cost $0.017 $0.016
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $0.340 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 39,886 125,703
Output Tokens 1,890 13,317
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.19s 5.41s
Response Time (max) 118.00s 29.95s
Response Time (total) 136.23s 108.12s
Parameters ~350B total (~20B active) 30.7B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#184 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.164
Time
215.5s
Tokens
65,659 tok

#180 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair