Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.017 vs $0.163. Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster at 6.20s vs 75.38s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 2.5 FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.3), while costing about 9.7x less than Gemma 4 31B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Release: 2025-06-17 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 6.2 6.3
Rank #112 #105
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.186 1.044
Total Cost $0.017 $0.163
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.220 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $0.550 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 39,877 94,992
Output Tokens 1,890 34,468
Reasoning Tokens 0 223,278
Response Time (avg) 6.20s 75.38s
Response Time (max) 118.00s 437.40s
Response Time (total) 136.37s 1507.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#112 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.164
Time
215.5s
Tokens
65,659 tok

#105 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair