Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.3. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.029 vs $1.152. Muse Spark 1.1 (medium) is faster at 23.35s vs 45.85s, with pass rates of 74.6% vs 76.2%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V4 Flash (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.3 vs 8.9), while costing about 40.5x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Release: 2026-04-24 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 medium Release: 2026-07-16
Score 8.3 8.9
Rank #30 #15
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.6% 76.2%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.299 7.676
Total Cost $0.029 $1.152
Input Price $0.098 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.196 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 39,745 59,928
Output Tokens 10,310 3,523
Reasoning Tokens 123,501 249,752
Response Time (avg) 45.85s 23.35s
Response Time (max) 218.13s 165.38s
Response Time (total) 962.79s 490.40s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#30 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
93.1s
Tokens
7,926 tok

#15 Muse Spark 1.1

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
29.2s
Tokens
5,774 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.66s 8,562 347 23,562

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair