Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.197. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 85.80s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#78
Total Output Tokens
618,417
Response Time (avg)
85.80s
Total Cost
$0.106
Rank
#72
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.4), while responding about 19.0x faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium Release: 2026-08-01 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #78 #72
Reliability 9.8 9.9
Consistency 7.1 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 68.2%
Flaky tests 8 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.956 1.582
Total Cost $0.106 $0.197
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $0.280 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,768 95,983
Output Tokens 66,624 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 551,793 0
Response Time (avg) 85.80s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 288.78s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 1887.69s 99.52s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#78 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

medium
Cost
$0.004
Time
93.3s
Tokens
13,252 tok

#72 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 6.4 4.4 77.8% 2 198.78s 6,032 4,109 160,154
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair