Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (medium) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro (low)

Kimi K3.1 Pro (low) leads on average score with 8.8 vs 8.7. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.591 vs $1.836. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (medium) is faster at 32.88s vs 47.50s, with pass rates of 73.9% vs 81.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-24

Compared models

Rank
#65
Total Output Tokens
444,665
Response Time (avg)
32.88s
Total Cost
$0.591
Rank
#60
Total Output Tokens
139,158
Response Time (avg)
47.50s
Total Cost
$1.836
Recommended model DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.7 vs 8.8), while costing about 3.1x less than Kimi K3.1 Pro (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek V4.1 Flash medium Release: 2026-09-10 Kimi K3.1 Pro Kimi K3.1 Pro low Release: 2026-10-24
Score 8.7 8.8
Rank #65 #60
Reliability 9.6 8.4
Consistency 9.3 8.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 73.9% 81.2%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.757 10.796
Total Cost $0.591 $1.836
Input Price $0.013 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.320 / 1M $10.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.013 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 280,643 221,802
Output Tokens 7,342 12,498
Reasoning Tokens 437,323 126,660
Response Time (avg) 32.88s 47.50s
Response Time (max) 276.31s 506.95s
Response Time (total) 756.34s 1092.61s
Parameters 748B total (16B active) ~2.8T total (~104B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#65 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.014
Time
34.7s
Tokens
11,541 tok

#60 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro

low
fetch failed
Cost
$0.000
Time
10.7s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 34.45s 7,509 396 71,345
Kimi K3.1 Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 18.91s 8,070 468 7,531

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3.1 PromaxDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumvsMuse Spark 1.2lowKimi K3.1 ProlowvsGPT-5.4mediumKimi K3.1 ProlowvsPareto 26.9defaultClaude Fable 5mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse Spark 1.1mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse Spark 1.2mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse Spark OpenmediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsKimi K3.1 ProlowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 MAXlowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-6 Sollow