Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Summary

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 leads on average score with 5.8 vs 5.3. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.020. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is faster at 2.31s vs 13.83s, with pass rates of 39.7% vs 46.0%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15It has the best score here (5.8), while responding about 6.0x faster than DeepSeek V3.2.

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Release: 2026-02-15
Score 5.3 5.8
Rank #157 #134
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 9.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.7% 46.0%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.306 0.204
Total Cost $0.020 $0.016
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 55,997 45,864
Output Tokens 11,165 2,480
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 13.83s 2.31s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 6.65s
Response Time (total) 290.43s 34.63s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#157 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#134 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

none
Cost
$0.012
Time
153.2s
Tokens
7,787 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 4.3 7.9 11.1% 1 2.05s 7,913 473 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair