- Rank
- #86
- Total Output Tokens
- 106,419
- Response Time (avg)
- 48.87s
- Total Cost
- $0.271
Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) vs Ling 3.1 Flash (medium)
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 8.3 vs 8.2. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.271. Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) is faster at 48.87s vs 88.74s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 71.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #81
- Total Output Tokens
- 648,854
- Response Time (avg)
- 88.74s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Seed-2.0-Lite (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (8.2 vs 8.3), while responding about 1.8x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Rank | #86 | #81 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.0% | 71.0% |
| Flaky tests | 4 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 1.931 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.271 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $2.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 229,530 | 369,495 |
| Output Tokens | 13,757 | 172,852 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 92,662 | 476,002 |
| Response Time (avg) | 48.87s | 88.74s |
| Response Time (max) | 254.92s | 567.88s |
| Response Time (total) | 1123.91s | 2041.10s |
| Parameters | ~200B total (~20B active) | 560B total (25B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#86 Seed-2.0-Lite
medium- Cost
- $0.005
- Time
- 86.7s
- Tokens
- 2,354 tok
#81 Ling 3.1 Flash
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 101.1s
- Tokens
- 11,607 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 69.33s | 99,624 | 1,227 | 3,896 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 100.10s | 233,792 | 12,506 | 12,249 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 17.99s | 942 | 996 | 7,142 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.24s | 750 | 1,152 | 3,396 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 8.0 | 9.8 | 66.7% | 0 | 156.74s | 8,247 | 458 | 31,890 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.15s | 8,298 | 19,577 | 62,002 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 58.52s | 99,411 | 9,809 | 13,940 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 306.46s | 106,402 | 26,806 | 100,471 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.07s | 8,562 | 246 | 1,742 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.92s | 8,016 | 1,334 | 3,754 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 84.35s | 852 | 12 | 24,616 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 262.25s | 837 | 100,307 | 228,869 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 6.7 | 3.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 18.25s | 582 | 304 | 1,620 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.28s | 546 | 152 | 1,820 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.26s | 834 | 71 | 1,480 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.57s | 744 | 323 | 1,317 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 9.0 | 7.9 | 88.9% | 1 | 10.23s | 894 | 403 | 3,285 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 42.32s | 747 | 5,455 | 40,080 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.38s | 9,306 | 222 | 1,011 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 47.17s | 9,135 | 3,850 | 12,018 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 48.32s | 276 | 9 | 2,040 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32.55s | 228 | 1,390 | 10,026 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGrok 4.5highSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423highSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashlowSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsKimi K3max