Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Trinity Large Thinking (high) leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.5. Ling 3.1 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.794. Ling 3.1 Flash is faster at 15.75s vs 74.52s, with pass rates of 42.0% vs 33.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-17

Compared models

Rank
#292
Total Output Tokens
717,762
Response Time (avg)
74.52s
Total Cost
$0.794
Rank
#308
Total Output Tokens
85,777
Response Time (avg)
15.75s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Trinity Large Thinking (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high Release: 2026-07-28 Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash none Release: 2026-10-03
Score 5.7 5.5
Rank #292 #308
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 7.3 8.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.0% 33.3%
Flaky tests 8 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 11.289 0.000
Total Cost $0.794 $0.000
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.060 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 283,116 286,758
Output Tokens 277,920 85,777
Reasoning Tokens 665,124 0
Response Time (avg) 74.52s 15.75s
Response Time (max) 510.21s 90.95s
Response Time (total) 1713.90s 362.23s
Parameters 398B total (13B active) 560B total (25B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#292 Trinity Large Thinking

high
Cost
$0.028
Time
130.1s
Tokens
34,387 tok

#308 Ling 3.1 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
171.4s
Tokens
20,178 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 3.7 4.7 33.3% 2 245.04s 7,204 83,616 266,836
Ling 3.1 Flash 4.5 7.5 22.2% 1 31.85s 8,307 27,810 0

Switch Comparison Pair