Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Granite 4.1 8B

Trinity Large Thinking (high) leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.0. Granite 4.1 8B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.007 vs $0.632. Granite 4.1 8B is faster at 1.45s vs 77.22s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 9.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#202
Total Output Tokens
953,758
Response Time (avg)
77.22s
Total Cost
$0.632
Rank
#224
Total Output Tokens
5,996
Response Time (avg)
1.45s
Total Cost
$0.007
Recommended model Granite 4.1 8B

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.0 vs 4.8), while costing about 100.5x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high Release: 2026-07-28 Granite 4.1 8B Granite 4.1 8B none Release: 2026-05-01
Score 4.8 4.0
Rank #202 #224
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.2 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 9.1%
Flaky tests 8 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.640 0.315
Total Cost $0.632 $0.007
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $0.850 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,767 113,827
Output Tokens 286,218 5,996
Reasoning Tokens 667,540 0
Response Time (avg) 77.22s 1.45s
Response Time (max) 510.21s 16.67s
Response Time (total) 1698.89s 31.96s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#202 Trinity Large Thinking

high
Cost
$0.028
Time
130.1s
Tokens
34,387 tok

#224 IBM: Granite 4.1 8B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.2s
Tokens
491 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 3.7 4.7 33.3% 2 245.04s 7,204 83,616 266,836
Granite 4.1 8B 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 775ms 8,344 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair