Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.1. GLM 5.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.535 vs $0.661. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 46.77s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#71
Total Output Tokens
19,362
Response Time (avg)
8.12s
Total Cost
$0.661
Rank
#82
Total Output Tokens
152,552
Response Time (avg)
46.77s
Total Cost
$0.535
Recommended model Claude Sonnet 4.6

It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 5.8x faster than GLM 5.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.3 7.1
Rank #71 #82
Reliability 10.0 8.3
Consistency 9.7 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 69.7%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 4.202
Total Cost $0.661 $0.535
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 82,623
Output Tokens 19,362 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 0 136,463
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 46.77s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 982.16s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#82 GLM 5.1

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair