Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Opus 5 vs MiMo-V2.5 (medium)

Claude Opus 5 leads on average score with 7.1 vs 7.1. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.419 vs $2.766. Claude Opus 5 is faster at 10.78s vs 49.20s, with pass rates of 55.1% vs 69.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#149
Total Output Tokens
31,386
Response Time (avg)
10.78s
Total Cost
$2.766
Rank
#152
Total Output Tokens
341,511
Response Time (avg)
49.20s
Total Cost
$0.419
Recommended model MiMo-V2.5 (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.1), while costing about 6.6x less than Claude Opus 5.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 none Release: 2026-07-25 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 7.1 7.1
Rank #149 #152
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 55.1% 69.6%
Flaky tests 1 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 23.044 3.491
Total Cost $2.766 $0.419
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 396,120 259,664
Output Tokens 31,386 8,414
Reasoning Tokens 0 333,097
Response Time (avg) 10.78s 49.20s
Response Time (max) 79.61s 316.27s
Response Time (total) 247.96s 1131.69s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) 310B total (15B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Claude Opus 5

none
Cost
$0.271
Time
149.3s
Tokens
10,962 tok

#152 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 5.9 9.7 33.3% 0 5.54s 10,590 2,886 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair