- Rank
- #21
- Total Output Tokens
- 36,457
- Response Time (avg)
- 25.88s
- Total Cost
- $1.266
Claude Opus 5.5 (high) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)
Claude Opus 5.5 (high) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 9.1. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.664 vs $1.266. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low) is faster at 24.21s vs 25.88s, with pass rates of 86.4% vs 86.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #27
- Total Output Tokens
- 75,865
- Response Time (avg)
- 24.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.664
Recommended model
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)
Its score stays close to the best score here (9.1 vs 9.3), while costing about 1.9x less than Claude Opus 5.5 (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 high | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.3 | 9.1 |
| Rank | #21 | #27 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 86.4% | 86.4% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 7.029 | 3.684 |
| Total Cost | $1.266 | $0.664 |
| Input Price | $4.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $20.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 134,020 | 103,954 |
| Output Tokens | 7,237 | 6,322 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 29,220 | 69,543 |
| Response Time (avg) | 25.88s | 24.21s |
| Response Time (max) | 95.95s | 207.79s |
| Response Time (total) | 569.33s | 532.62s |
| Parameters | ~5T total (~500B active) | 2.4T total (~100B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#21 Claude Opus 5.5
high- Cost
- $0.136
- Time
- 75.6s
- Tokens
- 6,934 tok
#27 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
low- Cost
- $0.014
- Time
- 41.2s
- Tokens
- 2,421 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.58s | 858 | 313 | 683 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.72s | 984 | 212 | 1,854 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.44s | 10,608 | 584 | 5,042 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 37.42s | 8,127 | 485 | 17,404 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 60.05s | 96,745 | 4,683 | 6,301 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 113.88s | 74,767 | 4,562 | 29,335 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.31s | 10,515 | 312 | 355 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.94s | 7,938 | 261 | 2,254 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 30.08s | 990 | 58 | 14,458 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 34.93s | 1,014 | 45 | 13,881 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.66s | 714 | 283 | 352 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 8.91s | 594 | 120 | 820 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.35s | 921 | 96 | 435 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.32s | 855 | 90 | 866 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 88.9% | 1 | 30.85s | 912 | 496 | 605 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.49s | 930 | 275 | 1,248 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 75.42s | 11,757 | 412 | 989 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.73s | 8,463 | 249 | 126 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 27.41s | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 13.28s | 282 | 23 | 1,755 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5.5highvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumClaude Opus 5.5highvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 5.5highvsGPT-5.5lowClaude Opus 5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5.5highvsGPT-6 AstramediumClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5.5highvsGPT-5.6 SolmediumClaude Opus 5.5highvsGPT-6 SolmediumGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)low