- Rank
- #26
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,071
- Response Time (avg)
- 13.59s
- Total Cost
- $3.364
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low) leads on average score with 9.1 vs 9.0. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.664 vs $3.364. Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is faster at 13.59s vs 24.21s, with pass rates of 89.4% vs 86.4%.
- Rank
- #23
- Total Output Tokens
- 75,865
- Response Time (avg)
- 24.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.664
Recommended model
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)
It has the best score here (9.1), while costing about 5.1x less than Claude Fable 5.1 (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Fable 5.1 high | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Rank | #26 | #23 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 89.4% | 86.4% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 17.701 | 3.684 |
| Total Cost | $3.364 | $0.664 |
| Input Price | $10.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $50.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 135,958 | 103,954 |
| Output Tokens | 7,930 | 6,322 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 32,141 | 69,543 |
| Response Time (avg) | 13.59s | 24.21s |
| Response Time (max) | 40.17s | 207.79s |
| Response Time (total) | 298.90s | 532.62s |
| Parameters | ~9.5T total (~878B active) | 2.4T total (~100B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#26 Claude Fable 5.1
high- Cost
- $0.384
- Time
- 102.5s
- Tokens
- 7,824 tok
#23 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
low- Cost
- $0.014
- Time
- 41.2s
- Tokens
- 2,421 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.90s | 858 | 287 | 790 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.72s | 984 | 212 | 1,854 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.91s | 10,608 | 520 | 6,503 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 37.42s | 8,127 | 485 | 17,404 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 34.59s | 98,419 | 5,484 | 5,373 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 113.88s | 74,767 | 4,562 | 29,335 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 10,515 | 312 | 403 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.94s | 7,938 | 261 | 2,254 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 24.34s | 990 | 63 | 12,436 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 34.93s | 1,014 | 45 | 13,881 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.40s | 714 | 291 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 8.91s | 594 | 120 | 820 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.60s | 921 | 97 | 263 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.32s | 855 | 90 | 866 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.11s | 912 | 506 | 558 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.49s | 930 | 275 | 1,248 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.30s | 11,757 | 354 | 118 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.73s | 8,463 | 249 | 126 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.58s | 264 | 16 | 5,697 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 13.28s | 282 | 23 | 1,755 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.5mediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 MaxmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsSeed 2.1 TurbolowClaude Opus 5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumClaude Opus 5highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.8 FlashmediumGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowGPT-5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)low