- Rank
- #30
- Total Output Tokens
- 27,194
- Response Time (avg)
- 24.18s
- Total Cost
- $1.080
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low) leads on average score with 9.1 vs 9.0. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.664 vs $1.080. Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) is faster at 24.18s vs 24.21s, with pass rates of 89.4% vs 86.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #27
- Total Output Tokens
- 75,865
- Response Time (avg)
- 24.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.664
Recommended model
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)
It has the best score here (9.1), while costing about 1.6x less than Claude Opus 5.5 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 medium | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Rank | #30 | #27 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 89.4% | 86.4% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 5.683 | 3.684 |
| Total Cost | $1.080 | $0.664 |
| Input Price | $4.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $20.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 133,954 | 103,954 |
| Output Tokens | 7,292 | 6,322 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 19,902 | 69,543 |
| Response Time (avg) | 24.18s | 24.21s |
| Response Time (max) | 90.20s | 207.79s |
| Response Time (total) | 532.04s | 532.62s |
| Parameters | ~5T total (~500B active) | 2.4T total (~100B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#30 Claude Opus 5.5
medium- Cost
- $0.053
- Time
- 25.6s
- Tokens
- 2,781 tok
#27 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
low- Cost
- $0.014
- Time
- 41.2s
- Tokens
- 2,421 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.42s | 858 | 321 | 657 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.72s | 984 | 212 | 1,854 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.50s | 10,608 | 636 | 4,341 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 37.42s | 8,127 | 485 | 17,404 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 55.69s | 96,679 | 4,639 | 4,527 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 113.88s | 74,767 | 4,562 | 29,335 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.65s | 10,515 | 312 | 277 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.94s | 7,938 | 261 | 2,254 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 21.35s | 990 | 61 | 8,360 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 34.93s | 1,014 | 45 | 13,881 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.17s | 714 | 273 | 326 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 8.91s | 594 | 120 | 820 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.33s | 921 | 96 | 336 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.32s | 855 | 90 | 866 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 30.12s | 912 | 513 | 491 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.49s | 930 | 275 | 1,248 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 74.20s | 11,757 | 441 | 587 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.73s | 8,463 | 249 | 126 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 27.75s | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 13.28s | 282 | 23 | 1,755 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsGrok 4.5highClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsSeed 2.1 TurbolowClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Opus 5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsMuse Spark 1.3highClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsParetononeClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsSeed 2.1 TurbohighGPT-5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)low