Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Glimmer 30B (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 6.9. Muse Glimmer 30B (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.266 vs $2.328. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 7.71s vs 22.40s, with pass rates of 60.9% vs 63.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#162
Total Output Tokens
24,523
Response Time (avg)
7.71s
Total Cost
$2.328
Rank
#161
Total Output Tokens
107,665
Response Time (avg)
22.40s
Total Cost
$0.266
Recommended model Muse Glimmer 30B (low)

It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 8.8x less than Claude Opus 4.8.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B low Release: 2026-08-11
Score 6.9 6.9
Rank #162 #161
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.9% 63.8%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 17.906 2.414
Total Cost $2.328 $0.266
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.350 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 342,921 307,228
Output Tokens 24,523 36,044
Reasoning Tokens 0 71,621
Response Time (avg) 7.71s 22.40s
Response Time (max) 69.14s 234.92s
Response Time (total) 177.38s 515.14s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) 30B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#162 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#161 Muse Glimmer 30B

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
13.5s
Tokens
953 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.1 9.9 66.7% 0 16.52s 7,419 2,759 10,173

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair