Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low)

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.1 vs 8.0. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.045 vs $3.636. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 14.12s vs 23.66s, with pass rates of 81.2% vs 79.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-07

Compared models

Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
57,978
Response Time (avg)
14.12s
Total Cost
$3.636
Rank
#100
Total Output Tokens
135,295
Response Time (avg)
23.66s
Total Cost
~$0.045
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.0 vs 8.1), while costing about 81.1x less than Claude Opus 4.7 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next low Release: 2026-10-04
Score 8.1 8.0
Rank #93 #100
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.2% 79.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 20.200 ~0.299
Total Cost $3.636 ~$0.045
Input Price $5.000 / 1M N/A
Output Price $25.000 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.500 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price $6.250 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 437,293 342,163
Output Tokens 29,102 1,518
Reasoning Tokens 28,876 133,777
Response Time (avg) 14.12s 23.66s
Response Time (max) 150.60s 166.72s
Response Time (total) 310.55s 544.16s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) 180B total (6B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#93 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#100 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

low
Cost
~$0.002
Time
47.2s
Tokens
5,270 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 29.46s 8,127 397 24,147

Switch Comparison Pair

Claude Opus 4.7mediumvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423highGemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 NanomediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423highClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.6 LunahighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.6 LunahighClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsSeed-2.0-Codelow