Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

Summary

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.0. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.220 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 4.73s vs 10.44s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 71.4%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 2.2x faster than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14
Score 8.7 8.0
Rank #16 #35
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 7.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 71.4%
Flaky tests 1 7
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.991 1.991
Total Cost $0.679 $0.220
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.740 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.960 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 65,406 42,750
Output Tokens 11,858 2,167
Reasoning Tokens 2,198 61,133
Response Time (avg) 4.73s 10.44s
Response Time (max) 23.18s 51.34s
Response Time (total) 94.51s 219.17s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#35 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

low
Cost
$0.016
Time
47.6s
Tokens
5,182 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 24.87s 7,893 402 24,945

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair