Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Claude Fable 5 (medium) leads on average score with 8.6 vs 8.4. Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.143 vs $3.478. Claude Fable 5 (medium) is faster at 17.20s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 78.8% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelClaude Fable 5 (medium)It has the best score here (8.6), while responding about 3.9x faster than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Release: 2026-06-10 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.6 8.4
Rank #22 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.8% 80.3%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 20.459 8.173
Total Cost $3.478 $1.143
Input Price $10.000 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $50.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,643 79,240
Output Tokens 41,360 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 10,269 164,842
Response Time (avg) 17.20s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 80.80s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 378.41s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 Claude Fable 5

medium
Cost
$0.606
Time
156.7s
Tokens
12,264 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair